Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of whatis

Timestamp:

2010-05-17T18:12:04Z (14 years ago)

Author:

Henry

Comment:

--

whatis

@@ -36 +36 @@
 
  1. simple evaluations: students assess the contributions of their fellow group members by distributing a set number of points (e.g. 100) among them.
- 1. Item 2
+ 1. rubrics ; the evaluation process is similar to a multiple choice questionnaire; each group member rates the others on a scale called "level of mastery".
+iPeer automates the process of peer evaluation and lowers the workload for both instructors and students. With the benefits of automation students can gain feedback more quickly. Additionally, instructors are less likely to lose evaluations and more likely to encourage peer evaluations.
 And numbered lists can also be given an explicit number:
 
 1.   
-1.  rubrics ; the evaluation process is similar to a multiple choice questionnaire; each group member rates the others on a scale called "level of mastery".
-iPeer automates the process of peer evaluation and lowers the workload for both instructors and students. With the benefits of automation students can gain feedback more quickly. Additionally, instructors are less likely to lose evaluations and more likely to encourage peer evaluations.
+1.